Tuesday, December 27, 2011

ATP Oil & Gas (ATPG) - Elevated Vol Trend

ATPG is trading $7.39, up 3.1% with IV30™ up 2.5% as of ~11am EST. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (ATP). is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico and the United Kingdom and Dutch sectors of the North Sea (the North Sea).

This is a vol note – specifically a company with elevated vol that tends to move in a patterned ebb and flow. Let’s start with the Charts Tab (6 months), below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



I’ve circled/highlighted a lot here. In the stock portion (top) we can see three abrupt stock declines in the last six months. Two of those (the first and third) were directly off of an earnings release. On the vol side, we can see the implied spike into earnings. In the middle stock drop, we can see the implied spiked essentially as high as it did into earnings.

Let’s fast forward to today’s vol levels. We can see that while the implied is elevated to the two historical realized measures, it’s nowhere near those other three elevated levels.

Specifically:
IV30™: 104.61
HV20: 72.98
HV180: 89.42

Let’s turn to the Skew Tab to examine the month-to-month and line-by-line vols.



We can see that the Jan and Feb vols lie almost directly on top of each other so the elevated vol right now doesn’t seem to be focused on an event in one month and not in another. Ultimately the skew is “normal,” with the downside puts bid relative to the OTM calls.

Finally, let’s turn to the Skew Tab for completeness.



I wrote about this one for TheStreet.com (OptionsProfits), so no specific trade analysis here. I will say that the The 52 wk range in stock price for ATPG is [$5.53, $21.40]. While the next earnings release is likely after Feb expo, it’s the fact that the stock dropped and vol spiked a much as it did without an earnings report that caught my attention wrt to risk.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Pre-Market/Post Market: 12-27-2011

To get an e-mail alert when a new pre-market report is posted please send an e-mail to support (support (at) livevol.com) with "Pre-market" in the subject line.

-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------



Download as .pdf: PDF Download




Download as .pdf: PDF Download

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Mead Johnson (MJN) - Stock Drops, 80% Spike in Vol Pushes New High on Product Recall from Wal-Mart

MJN is trading $64.00, down 16.3% with IV30™ exploding up 81.8%. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Mead Johnson Nutrition Company (Mead Johnson) is a pediatric nutrition company. The Company manufactures, distributes and sells infant formulas, children’s nutrition and other nutritional products.

The news hitting the stock and pushing the vol is of a recall from Wal-Mart after an infant tragically died. Here's the news:

---
(Reuters) - Mead Johnson (MJN.N) shares fell as much as 12 percent on Thursday following the recall of some of its Enfamil baby formula from Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N) after the death of a Missouri infant.

[...]

Walmart began the process of voluntarily removing the product used by the infant's family [...]

The product is being held pending an investigation by health officials.

[...]

A growing number of Cronobacter infections among newborns has provided compelling evidence that milk-based powdered infant formulas have served as the source, the department said in a statement.

[...]

"The batch of our product used by the child's family tested negative for Cronobacter when it was produced and packaged, and that has been reconfirmed from our batch records following this news," Mead Johnson spokesman Chris Perille said.

[...]

Even if the product was not tainted, the Enfamil brand is likely to suffer, analysts said.

"Until the issue is resolved - and even for a period of time after - we would expect weak Enfamil sales," said JP Morgan analyst Ken Goldman in a research note. "The question is how bad and how long the perception of tainted formula - right or wrong - will last in the public's mind."

Source: Reuters via Yahoo! Finance: Mead Johnson sinks after Wal-Mart recall. Reporting By Martinne Geller in New York; Additional reporting by Lauren Keiper in Boston and Brad Dorfman in Chicago; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Matthew Lewis.
---

At 9:49am EST, theflyonthewall.com via Yahoo! Finance reported that Deutsche Bank called the MJN stock weakness a buying opportunity.

Taking another angle, an article on Forbes.com claims that an MJN director (Robert Singer) purchased stock for $70.28 on 11-21-2011. So, in other words, insiders were buying for $70, then perhaps $6x is a good buy... Ya know, or the company's product line is going to fail. Either way... You can read that full article here: Get An Even Better Deal On MJN Than Director Singer Did

Today, MJN has traded over 31,000 contracts on total daily average option volume of just 3,174. Puts have traded on a nearly 2:1 ratio to calls with the action in the Jan 65 and 60 puts accounting for nearly half the days' volume. The Stats Tab and Day's biggest trades snapshots are included (below).





The Options Tab (below) illustrates that the puts are trading with higher volume than the OI on both lines. Those actually feel like purchases to me for the most part -- which is odd in that those are bets purchasing popping vol and a beaten down stock indicating bets to lower stock and / or higher vol levels.



The Skew Tab snap (below) illustrates the vols by strike by month.



Through all of this craziness, the skew has actually maintained some order -- that is, the shape is normal with the downside puts showing higher vol than the ATM and the OTM calls. The front month is elevated to the back as is the the second to the third. Though it may be a bit early to look past this event, the next earnings release for MJN should be just after Jan expo -- so in Feb. Right now Feb options are priced to about six vol points lower than Jan.

Finally, the Charts Tab (6 months) is below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



We can see the drop today in the stock as well as the pop in IV30™ in the bottom portion. The 52 wk range in MJN stock price is [$54.26, $76.53] -- so the price today is not an annual low. The 52 wk range in IV30™ is [19.16%, 45.57%] -- so the implied is trading at an annual high... and then some. Keep in mind that the HV20 (and all HV measures) is recorded close-to-close, so that blue line will pop abruptly in tomorrow's chart.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Overseas Shipholding (OSG) - Elevated Vol, Correlation Risk, Detailed Vol Analysis -- Implied to Historical Comps

OSG is trading $10.47, up 3.4% with IV30™ down 1.6% as of ~10:50am EST. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. is a tanker company engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil and petroleum products. As of December 31, 2010, it owned or operated a modern fleet of 111 vessels (aggregating 11.3 million deadweight tons and 864,800 cubic meters) of which 88 vessels operated in the international market and 23 operated in the U.S. Flag market.

This is a vol note with detailed comp analysis to coincide with some levels in the stock price. Let’s start with the Charts Tab (6 months), below, and then some news. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



A bunch of stuff going on here.
1. The stock has been headed down for quite some time. Six months ago (6-22-2011) the stock closed at $28.06. As of this writing and the $10.47 print, the stock is down 63%. A year ago (not pictured), the stock closed at $35.51 – down 71% YTD.

2. On 11-18-2011 the stock closed at $13.99. Four calendar days later, the stock closed at $10.40. Here’s the news surrounding that abrupt drop:

---
Shipping company Frontline (FRO) said today that it might run out of money by early next year if the market doesn’t rebound, sending a ripple of fear through the entire industry. The company said that there are too many shipping vessels available now and not enough global demand for oil. Shares fell 41%.

“[W]ith the continued weak markets, we see ourselves in a very difficult situation,” said CEO Jens Martin Jensen on the company’s earnings call.
Source: Barron’s via Yahoo! Finance: Shipping Stocks Plunge After Frontline Report, written by Avi Salzman.
---

For the record and the intellectually obsessive, FRO stock is down 85% YTD from $25.68 to now $3.84.  Note however, that the stock drop for that period was entirely based on correlation / industry wide risk -- not company specific risk.

3. On the vol side, the consistent and large stock slide has catapulted the long-term trending HV180 (the long-term historical realized vol) from 33.47% to now 68.56%. In English, the stock's realized volatility has more than doubled over the last six months.

4. Since the Novemeber news from FRO, OSG hasn’t recovered, but it has found a sort of quiet period – no major moves up or down. That means the HV20 has dipped substantially since that period has rolled off of the 20-trading day average. In English, the blue-line has fallen dramatically over the last two days to almost exactly the long-term trend (HV180).

5. With #4 in mind, check out the action in the implied (red-line). Basically the IV30™ has been steadily dropping but not nearly as much as the short-term realized movement of the stock. This has created a fairly large vol diff between the implied and the two historical realized vol measures. Again, in English, the option market now reflects substantially more risk in the future than OSG has demonstrated in the last (past) trading month.

Specifically:
IV30™: 82.40
HV20: 68.87
HV180: 68.56

Let’s turn to the Skew Tab, below, to examine the month-to-month and line-by-line vols..



We can see that the Jan ATM options are priced below the Feb (in terms of vol). That’s interesting b/c while the IV30™ is drawn mostly from Jan at this point and is elevated to the historical realized measures, the Feb options are even more elevated. The last earnings cycle for OSG in Feb was 2-28-2011 so it’s reasonable to assume that the next earnings report will be after Feb expo. Said differently, the Feb elevated vol to Jan is likely not related to an earnings release but rather a reflection of the Dec doldrums.

Finally, let’s turn to the Options Tab for completeness.



We can see that Apr is priced above Feb (in vol terms) – that’s likely the earnings event that will fall in the Mar expiry. For the record, the next earnings release for FRO is likely in late Feb as the last two earnings dates have been 2-26-2010 and 2-28-2011.

I wrote about this one for TheStreet.com (OptionsProfits), so no specific trade analysis here.  I will say that the the 52 wk range in OSG stock price is [$9.05, $36.35] and the same range in IV30™ is [29.71%, 104.15%].   So, the vol looks juicy, but isn't at an annual high, so the risk reflected doesn't scream "extreme." Of course, that doesn't predict the future with any certainty.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Pre-Market/Post Market: 12-22-2011

To get an e-mail alert when a new pre-market report is posted please send an e-mail to support (support (at) livevol.com) with "Pre-market" in the subject line.

-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------



Download as .pdf: PDF Download




Download as .pdf: PDF Download

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Terex (TEX) - Depressed Vol, Earnings Date Ambiguity Priced in Skew

TEX is trading $13.36, down 1.2% with IV30™ up 0.3%. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Terex Corporation (Terex) is a diversified global equipment manufacturer of a variety of machinery products. Terex is focused on delivering customer-driven solutions for a range of commercial applications, including the construction, infrastructure, quarrying, mining, shipping, transportation, refining, energy and utility industries.

This is another vol note examining depressed implied to historical realized vol and again, this name has earnings approaching. Let's start with the Charts Tab (6 months) is below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



We can see the stock was trading near $30 and is down ~60% to $13.36 in less than six months. On the vol side, we can see how the implied has been diverging from the short-term historical realized vol (HV20) since late Nov. The divergence is more than implied simply falling, but it's in fact the coincidence of implied dropping as the HV20 has risen. In English, the implied vol has been dropping as the stock's actual movement has been rising. As of right now that vol diff is quite large. Specifically:

IV30™: 55.15
HV20: 92.12
HV180: 72.58

I'll get back to that little yellow line I drew in the vol chart, later. For now, let's turn to the Skew Tab, below.



We can see how Jan vol is depressed relative to Feb and Apr. A part of Jan's lower vol is the inclusion of the Holiday season. But it's not Jan that interests me.  The last four years, TEX earnings have been announced on:

2-9-2011
2-17-2010
2-11-2009
2-20-2008

Feb expiry this year is 2-18-2011. Tricky... Even more tricky, check out the earnings dates for the cycle before the Feb release:

10-20-2010
10-21-2009
10-22-2008
10-24-2007

And this year, earnings were released 10-26-2011. Earnings tend to be on Wednesdays for TEX. It seems like the next earnings cycle could be released on either Wednesday 2-15-2012 or Wednesday 2-22-2012. I believe it's that ambiguity that has Feb and Apr options priced to nearly identical vol.

Let's turn to the Options Tab for completeness.



We can see Jan is priced to 55.15 vol, while Feb is priced to 63.91 and Apr to 63.50. Back to the Charts Tab -- that ~63iv level is the yellow mark on the chart. Looking back to the vol comps, we can see that even that level is depressed to the HV20 and HV180. Of course, we don't know what those measures will be in two months, but for now, it's... interesting.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

United States Steel (X) - Depressed Vol, Earnings Approach

X is trading $25.08, up small with IV30™ down 0.5% as of ~10:40am EST. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

United States Steel Corporation (U. S. Steel) is an integrated steel producer of flat-rolled and tubular products with major production operations in North America and Europe.

This is a vol note, specifically looking a some depressed implied relative to the historical realized measures. Let’s start with the Charts Tab (6 months), below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



I actually used to make a market in X, fond memories. Anyway, check out the stock drop from mid Jul – this was a mid 40’s stock and now it’s mid 20’s. Another phenomenon in the stock chart is the relative stability over the last several trading days. Turning to the vol portion, we can see the implied has been dipping since mid Nov, falling from 79.36 to now 56.53. That vol dip has now created a situation where the implied is below both the short- and long-term historical realized vols. Specifically:

IV30™: 56.83
HV20: 83.52
HV180: 65.22

The 52 wk range in X stock is [$18.82, $63.75]. The 52 wk range in IV30™ is [31.11%, 89.56%]. So, while the implied is depressed, it’s still in the 44th percentile for the year.

Let’s turn to the Skew Tab to examine the month-to-month and line-by-line vols.



The next earnings release for X should be in the Feb options cycle. For the last two years earnings were on 1-26-2010 and 1-25-2011. We can see that the Jan expiry is priced below Feb (in vol terms). Both of them show a slightly parabolic skew – no single line seems out of whack.

Let’s turn to the Options Tab.



We can see Jan is priced to 56.83 vol while Feb is priced to 62.16. That Feb vol is still low relative to the historical realized measures.

I wrote about this one for TheStreet.com (OptionsProfits), so no specific trade analysis here. I will say that the vega in Feb ATM options is interesting given the embedded earnings announcement.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Pre-Market/Post Market: 12-21-2011

To get an e-mail alert when a new pre-market report is posted please send an e-mail to support (support (at) livevol.com) with "Pre-market" in the subject line.

-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------



Download as .pdf: PDF Download




Download as .pdf: PDF Download

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Sears Holding (SHLD) - Elevated Vol in Dipping HTB Stock

SHLD is trading $45.00, down 0.4% with IV30™ down 3.0% as of ~ 11:20am EST. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Sears Holdings Corporation (Holdings) is the parent company of Kmart Holding Corporation (Kmart) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears).

This is a vol note. With the market ripping there are plenty of names where implied is depressed to the recent and long-term historical realized vols. But, SHLD, is not one of those.

Let’s start with the Charts Tab (6 months) below. The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



Check out the stock chart… yikes. On 10-27-2011 the stock closed at $82.43. In less than two months the stock is now down $37.43 or 45.4%. On the vol side, we can see the implied is elevated to the two historical realized measures. Specifically:

IV30™: 62.94
HV20: 49.19
HV180: 52.19

Given the recent stock movement, a fair question could be – is the implied elevated enough?

Let’s turn the Skew Tab.



While Feb and Mar essentially lie on top of each other, Jan is depressed to both of the back months. For the last two years, SHLD earnings have been on 2-23-2010 and 2-24-2011, so it’s fair to assume that earnings will be after the Feb expiry. But… Feb is elevated to Jan and in line with Mar. Hmmm…

Let’s turn to the Options Tab, below, and examine a common but tricky phenomenon in the options.



I wrote about this one for TheStreet.com (OptionsProfits) so no specific trade analysis here. I will remind that SHLD is hard to borrow (HTB). We have a nice and neat $45 even price in the stock as of the snapshot of these option prices. But, look at the 45 strike in Jan. The calls are priced ~$2.78 and the puts are worth ~$3.68.

Strike: $45
Stock: $45
Calls: $2.78
Puts: $3.68

Implied Stock Price = Strike + Calls – Puts
= $44.00

The future implied (forward indexed) stock price is $44 – i.e. $1 lower than today.

What rate does that imply?

Jan expiration is Jan 20 or in 31 calendar days.
So, $1/$45 annualized from 31 days to 365 becomes: (1/45)/(31/365) = 26.2%

So the stock is quoting as -26.2% in Jan. Of course, the negative rate is not fixed – it’s a stochastic process like any other process in financial markets and can be quite volatile.

HTB stocks have all sorts of added risk – heap that on top of the stock’s recent drop, and all of a sudden, short naked vol in SHLD is... very risky.  Definitely deserving of elevated vol, at the very least.

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Why China Will Collapse By This Summer

Gordon Chang of Forbes.com and author of the book, “The Coming Collapse of China,” believes the miracle that has been Chinese growth (or perceived growth) is finally going to end.

He delivers compelling evidence –- some of which has been supported by the Wall St. Journal and other trusted sources. Below is the argument why China will collapse in the next six months with some commentary from... well, from me...

Following this discussion, I’ll play devil’s advocate and tell you why China won’t collapse.

The source for this information comes from an interview with Gordan Chang on Yahoo!. You can listen to that interview here:
The Wheels Are Coming Off China’s Economy: Gordon Chang

I’ve also grabbed snippets from the summary article on Yahoo! written by Morgan Korn for the Daily Ticker. The same URL (above) will get you that source.

-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Why China Will Collapse in 6 Months

---
"Gordon Chang, author of "The Coming Collapse of China" and a columnist at Forbes.com, has been sounding the alarm bells about China for years and backs up his prognosis with recent government data:

-electricity consumption is flat
-car sales - a bellwether for consumption - are flat
-property prices are collapsing - even in cities like Shanghai and Beijing
-industrial orders are down - especially those relating to the domestic economy"
---

What does Mr. Chang mean by collapsing property values? According to him, property values fell by 30% in Shanghai and Beijing in the month of October, alone. 30% !? If true, that’s, well... it’s unbelievable.

The Chinese government (and the world at large) has been vigilant if not obsessive about China’s rate of inflation. Most of the focus has been on keeping it from going too high as elevated inflation would prevent them from continually flooding the economy with money. But, the numbers reported by the Chinese government state that inflation fell from 5.5% in October down to 4.2% in November. Good right? Not quite. Chang claims that inflation dropping is a problem if it’s too fast – and he’s right. If those numbers are accurate – 1.3% in a month is almost preposterous. If repeated, that’s not a slowdown – that really is a collapse.

The article goes on to read:

---
The Chinese government raised interest rates at least three times in 2011 to fight inflation, which hit a three-year high of 6.5% in July. November's inflation reading was the lowest since September 2010.
---

China’s fix (actually the entire world’s fix) for a potentially fledgling economy has been to pump money into the economy (see the US and Eurozone). But, there’s a problem with that now.

---
Gordon says China cannot pump more money into the system to stimulate growth because of "questionable bank loans" and the high number of local Chinese provinces in debt.
---

That doesn’t sound very good. Actually, it sounds pretty bad. Chang then drops a bomb with a statistic on Chinese M2. He claims that China’s M2 at the end of Nov was 34% larger than the United States’ even though the US economy is more than twice the size of China’s. In other words, there is money and liquidity – some could say, a glut of liquidity. In English, the liquidity that’s present isn’t getting used so adding more money won’t do anything. As Chang puts it, "They’ve already built their ghost cities."

Let that last quote ring in your ears…

So why the slowdown? Why is the money not going anywhere? According to Chang the EU (collectively) is China’s largest trading partner, and well, we now about the EU.

---
There are several factors contributing to China's slowdown, and Europe certainly plays a big factor. Europe is China's largest trading partner and Chinese export orders in November dropped sharply from October, rising 13.8% last month from 15.9% in October. As reported by The Wall Street Journal, China's labor costs are no longer considered "cheap" as fewer migrant workers choose factory jobs, thus "pushing up labor costs."

"We'll see more obvious signs of deterioration in the Chinese economy over the next six months," says Chang.
---

Slowed growth is scary, but 13.8% month over month seems pretty good. Of course, unless the number is fictitious.

Chang claims that throughput stats and air cargo numbers combined with worker malcontent – protests, etc, point not to growth, but to a massive slowdown. In English, while the slower growth that’s been reported in and of itself is a signal of a potential collapse, he seems to be hinting that there isn’t a slow in growth, but rather an actual decline. A decline large enough to cause riots.

But, it gets worse... Chang says, "China has political paralysis right now. […] This is a critical period for not only the economy but also for society."

The Yahoo! Article reads:

---
China's recent economic problems may be disconcerting, but the country faces a much bigger dilemma: its political system. Chinese officials have cracked down on recent protests, such as last week's social unrest in the village of Wukan. The Chinese government has been unable to silence media reports, an unusual outcome for a country that closely monitors and censors the daily interactions and Internet activity of both dissidents and citizens. Chang says the riots, bombings and insurrections taking place in local villages and provinces has led to an "unprecedented campaign of coercion" by Chinese military and police but "the more they clamp down, there more protests" will result.
---

Chang points to not only the number of protests and protesters (which he put sin the hundreds of thousands), but that they have turned into "insurrections" – riots, bombings and violence.

He claims that there’s a standoff in a village in Wukon which he refers to as "the heart of the export belt" which if not handled properly by local authorities could spread throughout China and cripple China.

On a side note, I have written a few time about specific Chinese companies and what seems like openly fraudulent accounting. I wrote an article posing the question if China is the largest accounting fraud in the history of financial markets – a state backed epidemic. You can read that article here:

Focus Media (FMCN) - Is China A State Backed Accounting Fraud Epidemic?

Ok, that’s the doomsday scenario. Here’s another take.

Why China Will Not Fail
Henry Blodget goes on to remind us that it’s been nearly two decades, now, since analysts with expertise in China have been claiming the collapse is coming. But, it hasn’t yet. Or at least, we don’t think it has. During the 2008 financial collapse China pumped money in and it worked.

Going back to the number that China reported for inflation -- a drop from 5.5% in October down to 4.2% in November. Chang claims that the inflation dropping is a problem if it’s too fast. But, in the same breath, he says that inflation is likely twice the number that the Chinese government is reporting (i.e. he's claiming a misrepresentation). So, either inflation is dropping too fast, or it’s over inflated – which one? If it truly is twice the reported number, then the M2 glut is working – the velocity of money is high and more money pumping may work.

The thing is, we just don’t know. But we haven’t known for a long time with China – it’s all coerced data – internally and externally. And if that’s the case, is it possible that inflation is neither too high nor too low? Or, maybe more accurate, is it possible we just don’t know, and if so, then we can’t take a stand one way or the other? Certainly not to the point of calling for a collapse.

My View
Anytime a government (especially in a Command Economy) is accused of hiding and manipulating data (and propaganda) it’s troubling. China has gotten to the point where it’s almost just accepted – yeah, they don’t tell us the real stuff, either on a macro level or on a micro (company-by-company) level. That’s worked – whatever the numbers, the country has been pushing global markets and demand with cheap labor costs.

But, we need not look further than our own fraud epidemic in 2000. NASDAQ fell by 70% -- remember those days? If China follows that model, but worse as the above analysis accuses, the result could be, well... Cataclysmic.

But then again. We’ll recover, and move on to our next fraud or bubble. Right?...

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Pre-Market/Post Market: 12-20-2011

To get an e-mail alert when a new pre-market report is posted please send an e-mail to support (support (at) livevol.com) with "Pre-market" in the subject line.

-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------



Download as .pdf: PDF Download




Download as .pdf: PDF Download

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html

Monday, December 19, 2011

Patriot Coal (PCX) - Depressed Implied to Historical Vol; Depressed Implied to Implied

PCX is trading $8.57, down 3.7% with IV30™ down 2.0%. The LIVEVOL® Pro Summary is below.



-----------------------------------------------------------


Click for Free Trial

-----------------------------------------------------------

Patriot Coal Corporation and its subsidiaries (Patriot) is a producer of thermal coal in the eastern United States, with operations and coal reserves in the Appalachia and the Illinois Basin coal regions.

This is another vol note, but this time for depressed implied relative to the historical realized measures. I found PCX using a real-time custom scan that hunts for low vols.

Custom Scan Details
Stock Price GTE $7
IV30™ - HV20™ LTE -8 GTE -40
HV180™ - IV30™ GTE 7
Average Option Volume GTE 1,200
Industry != Bio-tech
Days After Earnings GTE 32

The snapshot of the scan is included (below) in case you want to build it yourself in Livevol® Pro.



The goal with this scan is to identify short-term implied vol (IV30™) that is depressed both to the recent stock movement (HV20) and the long term trend in stock movement (HV180). I'm also looking for a reasonable amount of liquidity in the options (thus the minimum average option volume), want to avoid bio-techs (and their crazy vol) and make sure I'm not purchasing depressed IV30™ relative to HV20 simply because of a large earnings move.

The PCX Charts Tab is included (below). The top portion is the stock price, the bottom is the vol (IV30™ - red vs HV20 - blue vs HV180 - pink).



We can see how the stock peaked in late Jul and then dropped off of earnings. That slide has continued for the last several months, and as of this writing, the stock is down ~65% from that re-earnings level.

On the vol side, this is a cool one where the implied tends to trade below the historical measures, unlike most of the stocks we've looked at lately. As of today the implied is down another 2%. The vol comps right now are:

IV30™: 73.74
HV20: 92.56
HV180: 89.06

So, IV30™ is depressed relative to the short-term and long-term realized movement of the stock.

Let's turn to the Skew Tab to examine the month-to-month and line-by-line vols.



We can see a couple of phenomena:

1. The Jan options are parabolic -- the upside and downside OTM options are priced to higher vol than the ATM.
2. The Feb ATM options are priced higher than Jan -- that is an earnings phenomenon as the last two years PCX has released earnings on 2-2-2010 and 2-1-2011.

Finally, let's look to the Options Tab (below).



Note that Feb is priced ~9 vol points higher than Jan while Mar is actually in line with Feb. In English, not only is Jan depressed to the recent historical realized levels, but also relative to the implied of Feb and Mar. Cool...

This is trade analysis, not a recommendation.

Follow Live Trades and Order Flow on Twitter: @Livevol_Pro

Legal Stuff:
http://www.livevolpro.com/help/disclaimer_legal.html